Eccentric Supreme Court and Its Whimsical Judgments
By Bikram in Society | 0 comments
In one of its whimsical judgments, Supreme Court of India has promulgated that state governments do not have any right to appeal in the cases being investigated by CBI (Central Bureau of Investigation). As per the judgment, the right to appeal against the judgment passed by special CBI courts rests exclusively in the hands of central government.
The Apex court has robbed state government of its power to appeal against any judgment passed by special court in cases being probed by CBI. This ruling may have brought big smile on Lalu Yadav’s face, but it made me frown.
What are the implications of this ruling?
For one thing, the judiciary will become more corrupt.
Well, I believe you do not believe in the fable of “incorruptible judiciary”. And do we need to remind ourselves how dysfunctional our legal system is?
If you believe, the dysfunction of the judiciary is mere the problem of system and not corruption then ask yourselves how Judges amass so much wealth. In the lower courts, lots of cases are settled on a bottle of whiskey, a plate full of chicken, and wads and wads of cash.
How often have you heard a poor person winning the case against an affluent person?
I challenge you to recall even an incidence where this had happened.
By taking away the right to appeal in the apex court, the Supreme Court has unknowingly provided fodder to already-corrupt judiciary. Buying or threatening judges on the lower level is easier than it is on the upper level. This rule will give more incentive to special courts to end the case then and there. And in most of the cases, the verdict will not be challenged by the Center in the Supreme Court.
This is how justice will be done.
What kind of cases CBI handles?
If you want to know who will benefit from this judgment, you should focus on the cases that CBI looks after, and also on people whose destiny these cases decide. Most of the cases probed and investigated by CBI involve people in power. And do I need to tell, how far they can go to get the verdict in their favor from lower courts?
I would suggest the Supreme Court to consider the implication of the judgment it passes, before proclaiming any judgment. A view of the larger picture is necessary.
email this | tag this | digg this | tweet this | trackback | comment RSS feed
Nitish Kumar, the Chief Minister of Bihar, has wonderfully dealt with a minister who put “Scam charges” on his own department and CM’s secretariat. He has sacked his Excise minister Jamshed Ashraf for speaking truth.
Martin Luther king Jr. had a dream and Barak Obama has realized it. He said he can and America supported him, and so did the rest of the world. He swore as 44th president of the United States, and everyone watched him glued to the television. It was a proud moment, and we held our head high and fixed our gaze at the top-most invisible point in the horizon. It has been hundred days since and the time for a reality check has come.
My Name is Bikram. I am freelance writer.